"Attack Mark Boughton Will You?"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VR_BZih64Uk&feature=player_embedded

THANK YOU "DEB"

'YES' I WOULD!

Dear Readers:

     Someone named 'Alfonso Robinson' is bent on SMEARING my choice for Lt. Governor of CT MARK BOUGHTON http://blog.ctnews.com/robinson/2010/10/01/would-you-want-this-person-teaching-your-kids/ 
     Here is my 'copy' of what I just wrote to rebut this person.  I'm just going to place it here on the 'off-chance' that Blogger Alfie decides to NOT publish what I sent to him.
     Man...someone needs to get their PRIORITIES STRAIGHT and start judging people not by their skin color but by the content of their character!
     My comment is below:
Your comment is awaiting moderation.

First and foremost, children, teachers, parents and politicians should be taught that PLAGIARISM is WRONG, UNETHICAL, IMMORAL & CORRUPT! THEN we will make some progress in our educational system! I EARNED my degrees the old-fashioned way–through brutal hours of hard work while ‘working’ to pay for my tuition and housing(a unique concept nowadays, apparently)
So take your liberal pap and…
God Bless You and thank you for reading the sorry commentaries below.
With Love in Christ,
Reverend Barbara Sexton
“The Biblical Biochemist-Where Science Meets the Cross
www.DearOnesHealingMinistry.blogspot.com
----------------------------------------------
LINKS:
http://www.snopes.com/history/american/mlking.asp
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Luther_King,_Jr._authorship_issues
“Boston University http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_University where King got his Ph.D. in systematic theology, conducted an investigation that found he plagiarized major portions of his doctoral thesis from various other authors who wrote about the topic.[3][4]According to civil rights historian Ralph E. Luker, who worked on the King Papers Project directing the research on King’s early life, King’s paper The Chief Characteristics and Doctrines of Mahayana Buddhism[5] was taken almost entirely from secondary sources.[6] He writes. Moreover, the farther King went in his academic career, the more deeply ingrained the patterns of borrowing language without clear attribution became. Thus, the plagiarism in his dissertation seemed to be, by then, the product of his long-established practice.[6]
Comment by Reverend Barbara Sexton — October 29th, 2010 @ 9:21 pm